Section D:
Choosing The Method, A Guide to Community Consultation and Research Methods

   
Quick Links:
About Us
Funding
Contact Us
   

 

 
Search:
 
    

Choosing The Method, A Guide to Community Consultation and Research Methods:

Face To Face Interviews
Telephone Interviews
Self Completion Questionnaires
Focus Groups
In Depth Interviews
Community Visioning
Mystery Customers
Consulting Representative Groups
User Complaints and Comments Scheme
Public Meetings
Road shows exhibition open days
Citizens Jury
Service User Groups
Planning For Real
Workshops
Fish Bowl Technique
Useful Contacts

Planning For Real

Summary Planning for real is where local people are actively involved in planning changes to their environment. Although a variety of visual materials can be used such as videos, slides, maps etc., this exercise usually involves planning using a large 3D model of the local area. The scale is such that people can see their own houses. The model can be prepared in advance by members of the community. Participants are asked to give their ideas by adding comments cards to the model. There are pre-prepared comments cards, which, depending on the purpose of the consultation exercise could indicate street lights, double glazing, trees, playground equipment etc. Participants are, however, also encouraged to put their own suggestions on the cards. Council officers are available to offer advice. This technique, which was developed in the 1970’s, can be a fun way of directly involving the community and giving them a sense of ownership of their area. It also tends to remove confrontation, which is often present in traditional public meetings.

Top

Examples Locally, Planning for Real has been used by Pat Fairfax, Community Development (Tel: 01274 327762) and Ian Kenning, Newlands Partnership (Tel: 01274 432512). The Newlands Partnership used Planning for Real to involve local people in determining priorities for redesigning parts of the area.

Top

Useful for Directly involving a community in planning, development and other environmental issues. Empowering local residents and giving them a sense of ownership. Obtaining new ideas and suggestions. Encouraging informal discussion of ideas.

Top

Not useful Obtaining the views of a large, representative sample of the population.

Top

Equal Rights

A technique that does not require literacy or require all residents to speak the same language. Choice of venue, format of information, access, child care, and transport need to be considered.


Top

Costs

Can vary greatly depending on whether an external company is used or the exercise is done in-house. If external consultants are used allow between £5,000 and £15,000.
There is a lot of planning, administration and time involved

Top

Time Scale 2-3 months

Top

Contact The Neighbourhood Initiatives Foundation 01952 590777
The Poplars
 
Lightmoor  
Telford  
TF3 3QN  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Top  
Section C 1  2   3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 Section E


    Introduction and Framework
Section A
Section B
Section C
Section D
Section E
   

 

   
Maintained by:
Mike Barnett
   

 


ERDF

 

Skip to Content