Section D:
Choosing The Method, A Guide to Community Consultation and Research Methods

   
Quick Links:
About Us
Funding
Contact Us
   

 

 
Search:
 
    

Choosing The Method, A Guide to Community Consultation and Research Methods:

Face To Face Interviews
Telephone Interviews
Self Completion Questionnaires
Focus Groups
In Depth Interviews
Community Visioning
Mystery Customers
Consulting Representative Groups
User Complaints and Comments Scheme
Public Meetings
Road shows exhibition open days
Citizens Jury
Service User Groups
Planning For Real
Workshops
Fish Bowl Technique
Useful Contacts

Workshops

Summary

Workshops are used by the Transportation and Planning Department as an alternative to the more confrontational public meeting and are structured to stimulate discussion and ideas around specific issues as part of an informed debate.
They are generally used at an early stage in the formulation of policy so
that different viewpoints and innovative solutions can be properly
examined and incorporated. It is made clear that the purpose of the
workshop is not to defend existing policy but to look to the future and do
things differently if necessary.
Workshops may run for a half day with the actual discussion taking up
11/2 - 2 hours. Participants are invited to represent a cross section of interests and divided into groups of about 10, each with a facilitator. The groups are
deliberately structured to include a broad spectrum of backgrounds and
agendas. The facilitator ensures that the debate centres around the key issues and that each participant has a chance to contribute.
At the end of the session all groups come together and compare their
conclusions to see if there is a consensus emerging.

Top

Examples As part of work on the Bradford City Centre Strategy, workshops have been
held on the future of towns and cities with a wide range of organisations and
internally with relevant Council officers.
A series of workshops is being held in Saltaire to gauge public reaction to the
proposal to make Saltaire a World Heritage Site.

Top

Useful for for Has proved more fruitful in getting feedback from interested organisations
than the alternative of public meetings or written comments. Similar to focus
groups in that it can raise issues that had not been thought of. Mixing groups
from different backgrounds helps each to better understand the others point
of view e.g. house builders/property developers can be in the same
discussion group as representatives of wildlife groups or residents groups.
.

Top

Not useful Success of method depends on whether participants can be considered
representative, the terms of reference for discussion and abilities of
facilitator to control the session. Analysing the discussion is time consuming.

Top

Equal Rights The workshops have included disabled participants so choice of venue is important for accessibility. Ethnic minorities are deliberately targeted for the contribution they can make to the discussion from their perspective.

Top

Costs A typical workshop might cost £500-600 to run. This includes room hire and
refreshments but not staff time for organisation

Top

Time Scale Two months to organise and evaluate.

Top

Contact Dave Preece 01274 434552
Transportation and Planning
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Top  
Section C 1  2   3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 Section E


    Introduction and Framework
Section A
Section B
Section C
Section D
Section E
   

 

   
Maintained by:
Mike Barnett
   

 


ERDF

 

Skip to Content